\centerline{\bf About Face!} \medskip \noindent Sub-titled ``Design, Choice and use of `Type' in Electronic Publishing and Page Design'', this was {\it another} {\sc bcs-ep} meeting, this time held on February 11th, at the usual venue, the School of African and Oriental Studies in Bloomsbury. This was a very well attended meeting, with many people who were not {\sc bcs-ep} regulars (as well as a number of familiar faces). The first talk was from David Saunders of Monotype. He presented a historical account of the rise of typefaces, from their early, handwritten origins, via Trajan's column through the rise of moveable type to the present day. Naturally covering such a sweep meant that he was selective, but he was also fascinating, interesting, educational and thought provoking. One of his themes was the interaction between design and technology. This is inevitable, but often the constraints are not obvious after the event. Early typefaces were derived from calligraphy (especially lower case, for which there were no stone cut originals). But gradually the calligraphic characteristics disappear, to be replaced by conventions more suited to the medium. Saunders also noted that new letterforms arose in the early industrial revolution, notably sans serifs, which were then regarded as expressions of the new age. In comparing quality we were shown comparisons between various laser printed and `conventionally' printed letterforms. The key issue here was that with good quality paper, laser printed material could be of good quality, and that all conventional printing was not automatically good. There are (or can be) problems with all types of printing. A conclusion to be drawn was that higher resolution does not ensure higher quality. From looking at the way in which typefaces have evolved, we looked next at some of the physiological and psychological bases for recognising the marks on the paper. John Richardson of Loughborough University described some of the results of studies which has been done by psychologists in this area. Most of this work is rather old now. From the way in which the eye handles text, it would seem that speed of reading for type of 9--12 points is about the same, but that it reduces for both smaller and larger sizes. Not surprisingly, there is a certain amount of visual interference in type set solid. The eye has difficulty skipping to the beginning of the next line. In the end we would seem to have to quote Eric Gill, who, in 1931 wrote ``Legibility, in practise, amounts simply to what one is accustomed to''. John Durham, assisted by the keyboard skills of Jenny Hearne, described the font editing software which has been developed by Archetype to permit modification of the fonts used by the large high volume laser printers (Xerox 9700). Essentially the system permits bitmap editing. Durham argued that hand tuning of algorithmic fonts would still be needed, and that simply scaling of a font to another size could not be expected to give good results. In order to achieve some degree of fidelity between screen and page, they used a high resolution monitor --- 100\,dpi, and grey scale fonts. In other words, the monitor's pixels were not simply black and white, but black, white and a range of grey. He also touched briefly on the problem of font licensing, since of course some of the fonts on these laser printers are proprietry. This was an interesting example of a small company siezing on a niche which the original vendor had failed to fill (for whatever reason), and exploiting it rather thoroughly. After lunch Kathy Lang described some font practicalities. In most ways she seemed most interested in larger scale typographic issues, but she described the sorts of things you expect to get in the better known dtp packages. I was surprised to see letterspacing included as something one expected, since I had just finished reading in Kleper's book that ``letterspacing should be avoided if possible''. Perhaps this is a feature incorporated because it is easy to do, regardless of its desirability (like `strike through' and underlining --- easy to implement, but useless). Lang went on to discuss the relative merits of `write white' and `write black' laser printers. One of the audience was able to reveal that the new Apple LaserWriter II is capable of 400\,dpi (although it only does 300\,dpi just now). John Miles, of Banks \& Miles described the employment of dtp in his design studio. Even if you don't realise, you will be familiar with some of the output of this studio. They designed the logos for the Post Office and British Telecom (among other well known corporate identifiers). The studio uses a couple of Macs with PageMaker and RSG!. But before describing what they did with the Macs, he stood back a little to explain what it was they were trying to achieve in the first place. He identified a necessary focussing on function. What was the intention of the material, how would it be used? One of the distinctions he made was between legibility (the property of a typeface) and readability (a function of the arrangement of typefaces). Most of this talk was illustrated with reference to designs on bits of paper, rather than a screen, but tempered by the knowledge that they would end up as grids on a dtp system. The starting point was a sheet of paper, not the screen. He noted that it was the job of the designer to fulfill the function expected by the client, not to demonstrate the versatility of the equipment. He also attempted to dispell the myth that there was anything valuable to be gained by changing typeface or leading etc.\ `at a stroke'. Any designer worthy of his hire would know these characteristics before he started to look at the computer. The last talk was by the type designer, Richard Southall, who, as many will know bears some responsibility for some bits of Computer Modern, and who has a considerable ability with \MF. But even if you didn't know that, you would be familiar with Richard's work. He designed the sub-titling font which is used by the {\sc bbc} for its films (also seen on Channel 4). Early in his talk Richard made the distinction between \item{$\bullet$}a character image --- the marks which a marking engine makes for readers to see. This includes the letters made by laser printers, dot matrix printers, or even those made on a vdu screen. \item{$\bullet$}a font --- a set of instructions to a marking engine to make a character image. This might be a bit map or an algorithm, or even a piece of type. \item{$\bullet$}typeface --- the sets of visual attributes for the characters of a script. As such a typeface has no concrete existence, it is an abstract object. The nearest concrete entity is probably the designer's original drawings. \smallskip Richard expressed the view that the changes which were taking place now, since the introduction of dtp in 1984 closely paralleled those which took place between 1965 (with the introduction of photo composition) and the virtual extinction of hot metal typesetting in 1971. He also pointed out the short period which had elapsed since the introduction of digital photocomposition (in 1965). To an extent the old constraints had been removed, such that almost anyone can now design a typeface. He pointed out that the commercial pressures to use outline fonts were overwhelming, but that the outline was a long way distanced from the typeface it purported to represent. He commented too on the use of intelligent outlines, citing \PS, but also the more recently announced Bitstream, Compugraphics and Imagen fonts which add information to the character outlines. But he also said that he could not ``see how to make the outline intelligent enough''. However, Richard has slightly retracted from his earlier view that \MF\ was unusable, and he now expresses the view that, subject to some pretty massive constraints, `You can use \MF' A good set of talks which from the extent of interest shown and the questions asked met some sort of need. The next {\sc bsc-ep} meeting is on April 28th. Later this year there will be a meeting on technical typesetting. \rightline{\sl Malcolm W. Clark} \bigskip